Lantz, A.: Intervjumetodik – Den professionellt genomförda intervjun (in Swedish). Studentlitteratur. () 6. Abrahamsen, P.: Samarbete, samverkan, samvaro. Kvale, Steinar Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun. Studentlitteratur, Lund. Lantz, Annika Intervjumetodik. Studentlitteratur, Lund. Marander-Eklund. Author: Lantz, Annika, Publication year: Language: Swedish. Media class: Book. Publisher: W&W,. ISBN:

Author: Gardazragore Gardaktilar
Country: Kazakhstan
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Medical
Published (Last): 4 February 2007
Pages: 335
PDF File Size: 7.95 Mb
ePub File Size: 15.5 Mb
ISBN: 757-9-18176-536-3
Downloads: 42647
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kek

The results are based on work task analysis two studies and questionnaires. LPS principles short work flows, focus on value-stream, standardization, and routinization limit intetvjumetodik and complexity, and are opposed intetvjumetodik a job design that supports individual- and team learning see e.

In the second study we investigate qualitative differences between how close-to the-production specialists describe their CBC with stagnant teams 1 SD below mean on team proactivity in study 1 and proactive teams 1 SD above mean in study 1and how managers support and engage in CBC. The main difference is between thinking teamwork or individual work, expanding work into joint problem-solving or defining divided and clear-cut work roles, in the coordination lantx different support functions activities, and if teams are involved in prioritizing what should be done.

International annual edition of applied psychology: The principles of job design of production tasks, e. We hypothesize that job design parameters team participation in decision making regarding job routines, participative leadership style, cross-functional cooperation enhance team proactivity via team learning building shared meaning as nitervjumetodik mediator. In this paper our aim is to investigate the role of cross-boundary collaboration CBC for team learning and proactivity, and identify hindrances and prerequisites for such collaboration.

How can the paradox between the standardization of work and innovative teamwork be understood? How can such proactive behavior be supported? Annika Lantz, Peter Friedrich. Telephone 39 A ihtervjumetodik is that teams within LPS can be engaged in workplace innovation depending on how they take on additional tasks, as these impact team learning.

We intwrvjumetodik with an overview of the main findings and discuss how contextual and situational aspects impact team processes, and how factors on individual, team and organizational levels interact.


Intervjumetodik – Annika Lantz – Google Books

The implications for future research and practice are discussed. Lean production stresses continuous improvements for enhancing efficiency, and such processes rely on individuals and teams that are proactive.

To reduce nonvalue-adding activities means to standardize work procedures and hence to reduce autonomy. A clear distinction between autonomy and participation contributes to the understanding of the links between job design, learning processes and team proactivity. How do we want to work tomorrow?

Chapter Why Are We in a Team? In a second step, we define teams and distinguish them from other groupings.

We propose and test a model itnervjumetodik the team learning process of building shared meaning of work mediates the relationship between team participative decision-making, inter team relations and team proactive behaviour. Creativity and Innovation in Organizations. The authors range from major classics in the field to newcomers from several countries presenting their research results.

Three kinds of tasks were identified.

Article Leaned teamwork fattens workplace innovation. November 20, Bookmark and share Tell a friend. It is not always intervjumetodim teams are effective. This book addresses the links between unemployment, precariousness work and health risks from various scientific frames of reference as well as those of policy-makers.

Research methods in Human-Computer Interaction (2D5339, HMI 651), Fall 2000

Supportive leadership has an effect on group processes that in turn impact group initiative and self-organizational activities and a direct effect on group llantz as well. Annika Lantz, Kin Andersson. Links Psykologiska institutionen Arbets- och organisationspsykologi. An Introduction to Work and Organizational Psychology, Team learning mediates the relationship between participative decision-making and inter team collaboration on team proactive behaviour.

The lean concept is widely spread to both public bodies and enterprises, and it has been shown that it can be linked to increased stress and an increase in workload. There are many reasons for why people work in teams, including managerial beliefs that teamwork can be beneficial to organizational effectiveness.

The research model was tested by mediation analysis on aggregated data 56 teams. Very few studies lanhz investigated the paradox between lean and teamwork, yet many lean-inspired productions systems have teamwork as a pillar for enhancing effectiveness.


Many organizations have structured their work around teams, and most people have an experience of teamwork where they have felt the joy of accomplishing things together, learning from others, and getting good and rewarding results.

About this website and cookies Privacy policy Vacancies Contact. The purpose of this paper is to explore job design mechanisms that enhance team proactivity within a lean production system where autonomy is uttermost restricted. Participation in forming the standardization of work is linked to managerial style, which can be changed and developed also within a lean concept.

Our aim is to contribute to research on workplace innovation by identifying tasks within industrial Lean Production Systems LPS that can trigger the involvement of teams in workplace innovation. Our conclusion is that teams within LPS can be engaged in workplace innovation depending on how they take on additional tasks, as these impact team learning.

Conference Cross-boundary collaboration and team innovation. Journal of Workplace Learning 27 1 The results presented in this paper are based on two studies, part of a larger longitudinal project on teamwork on the shop-floor within LPS in manufacturing industry.

An investigation of the effects of different leadership styles and management policy on proactivity through team-learning processes might shed light on how leadership promotes proactivity, as results support the effects of team participative decision-making — reflecting management policy — on proactivity.

Research methods in HCI, formdi09

A conclusion is that the potential for team-learning processes and proactivity lies in those work activities that are not standardized, and good inter-team collaboration in the work-flow.

Works at Department of Psychology. Annika Lantz Friedrich, Daniela Ulber. Article Participative work design in lean production. Conference Teamwork within lean production or the paradox between standardization of work and innovation. Unemployment, precarious work and health,