In Colombia especially, Chiquita has done a lot of harm. Essays Related to Chiquita – Blood Bananas Case Study. In the banana trade for. Case Study: BLOOD BANANAS CHIQUITA BRANDS INTERNATIONAL INC: Chiquita is the leading distributor of bananas in the United States in a Colombian paramilitary organization blackmailing Chiquita Brands that it will be good for. Blood Bananas: Chiquita in Colombia. Blood Bananas: Chiquita in Colombia. case study. Mary B. Teagarden ยท Andreas Schotter.

Author: Yojar Gardataxe
Country: Senegal
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Environment
Published (Last): 26 April 2011
Pages: 158
PDF File Size: 19.13 Mb
ePub File Size: 8.24 Mb
ISBN: 166-9-56432-243-9
Downloads: 21814
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Maugrel

If the country was not in any disarray, thenthe theoryofegoism would not be able support their views and if the company did not have a sordid past then they could have avoided most of these actions At that time, it was common that this paramilitary organization blackmailed companies and people. Following this approach, Chiquita would have not agreed on doing business with AUC. Even though Chiquita was in a though situation, making payments to AUC was not the only option they had.

Remember me on this computer.

Not even Colombian Government had a way of controlling and stopping these activities. Go to advanced search.

Blood Bananas- Chiquita in Colombia | Eduardo Dos Santos –

However, at the moment that Chiquita decided to have a chiqukta with AUC, they place all their employees in possible danger for being related to an armed group during a civil war. My account New to The Case Centre? We will write a custom essay sample on.

Along with ln, Carl Lindner, who had a well-known reputation within the financial community for bottom fishing, chiuita his ownership when the company had exited under Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

Tax ID No The third and last possible solution was to shut down its Colombian operations and leave the country. Since AUC was not a government agency, they should not be responsible to charge international companies for tariffs. Mary B Teagarden ; Andreas Schotter. Chiquita Brands Company Overview Chiquita Brands is a Global Company whose main business and revenues come from producing and growing fruits and vegetables. Bachelor’s or higher degree.


Those groups were independent from the Colombian government. They engaged in this business for eight years, from through until they confessed to the U.

Colombia has been a very perilous country for bananxs people, but now cuiquita is coming out of the effects of narco terrorism and civil war. That placed a lot of responsibility on Chiquita, as its operations was located in a place that demanded a lot of social, political, and economical attention due the civil war. Utilitarianism is based on decisions that will result on the greater good Johnson, I believe that if you have the wherewithal to pay, and it is really convenient for you to keep your business operating, do as they ask or simply leave.

Page count 1 page words. We will write a custom essay sample on Case Study: In the accounting field, professionals are faced with these two things, that is the reason why the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was passed, because people had either no ethics or not proper morals. After everything that occurred, the new leader of Chiquita should step back and apologize for all the unethical and illegal actions the company made on the past.

BLOOD BANANAS: CHIQUITA IN COLOMBIA Case Study Help – Case Solution & Analysis

As soon as the armed organization started requesting money, Chiquita could refuse to pay. School of Global Management, What is your topic? The company had somehow moved out of their ethical dilemma of making payments to terrorists but it is now facing major challenges to restore its banaanas and regain its competitiveness in future.

I did some research and I found that Chiquita Brands chose scenario number one.

They were basically forced to work for a company related to a terrorist organization, without any guarantee of safety or stability. Sorry, colombua copying text is forbidden on this website. Due to recession and income inequality, an atmosphere was created in the business world where people could take advantage of other people easily Jin, A number of things could be now done by the CEO of Chiquita to restore its reputation such as becoming more transparent, following core ethical values, compensating the people of Colombia and strictly creating ethical boundaries of conducting business in Colombia.


Say no and continue its operations as they used to. First, the company itself suffered from a very complicated and babanas past.

Product details

Rubik Atamian in UTPA and since the beginning of it, he thought us and wanted us to know the difference between morals and ethics. Making the payments to AUC is ethically questionable, and afterit became unlawful.

Strategy and General Management. Anything that would be decided in court, Chiquita would have to follow. We’ll occasionally send you account related and promo emails. As the case study points out, the Industry faced many challenges.

The challenge would be to recovery that in order to bring back the company to where it once was before.

BLOOD BANANAS: CHIQUITA IN COLOMBIA Case Study Help – Case Solution & Analysis

Such incidents had created a very cruel environment where the owners of the company were forced to pay taxes to the terrorist organizations and if they refused, then their employees were killed.

They have no mercy. By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.

The fact that AUC was an chiqquita group involved on a civil war, leads to a believe that Chiquita was financing a war, and that money could have been used for weapons jn munition.

syudy By choosing this scenario, Chiquita Brands would need to hire its own security staff and increase its operation costs in order to pay for this unexpected change in employees. The categorical imperative approach, by Kant, defends the fact that decisions should be made based on what is morally right, without taking in consideration the outcome Johnson,