No Dt Service regulations of. APSEB. No Dt and. No Dt APSEB pension rules. to APSEB. (Revised) Conduct Regulations -Orders -Issued. -~ ~~-~-~~-~-~ in the service All Deputy General Managers/P&G Services/SPDCL/Tirupati. APSPDCL -APSEB Leave Regulations as adopted by APSPDCL -Grant of Maternity in exercise of the powers referred to in Regulation 41 of APSEB Service.

Author: Dougore Dull
Country: Turks & Caicos Islands
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Spiritual
Published (Last): 26 August 2012
Pages: 110
PDF File Size: 14.66 Mb
ePub File Size: 16.16 Mb
ISBN: 788-5-16323-743-2
Downloads: 62200
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Doukree

What apsev worth noticing is that the appellant in categorical terms stated that the charges, and allegations were vague, indefinite and lacking in material particulars and pointed out that unless the charges are made specific to the point and contain full details with date, time, place and person regulationw. May Review date: Sanction of additional charge allowances.

The medical certificates produced by me certify the same. For computation of the minimum service i. The order of the servuce respondent communicated in Memo dt. It has been observed by this Court in Surath Chandra Chakravarty vs.

This Code of Practice is published by the Commissioner for Public Appointments in fulfilment of his duties as set out in the Order in Council for Public Appointments as amended.

Processing of files for 1. Holding that the charges were vague and indefinite because of lack of particulars, the Supreme Court observed as follows: I submit that the same thing happened to me on both the dates.

Choudhary, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, is that the charges were vague, particularly Charge VI, which related srrvice the unauthorised absence of the petitioner from duty for more than one year.

Observing that the prime issue for consideration was whether the absence of the petitioner with effect from October 11, for more than one year was unauthorised, the 2nd respondent dealt with that aspect of the matter as follows:. We do not find any merit in this contention.


In exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to article of the Constitution and in supersession of More information. Ministry of Finance and the Public Service More information.


In Memo dated October regulatiions, the 2nd respondent observed as follows: Freedom of Information Act Definition document for universities and other higher education institutions. E diploma qualification subject to maximum of two years and six months shall be taken in to account for all categories.

You have also not closed the work orders operated by you in the Construction Section, Macherla.

This is a paid feature. Therefore, in the background of the petitioner’s continuous absence for long stretches and, in particular, his absence continuously from October 11,the question posed by Charge VI is whether the petitioner was unauthorisedly absent for a period exceeding one year attracting the provisions of Regulation 28 3 of the Service Regulations.

Electricpoints – Source of Power: APSEB Service Regulations Part II

Raghavaiah during his tenure as Addl. Log In India UK. It is the end-users responsibility to do the following prior to the contractor providing services: I submit to kindly make a detailed study about this point and make justice to me.

We find that there is adequate and substantial compliance with the requirements of fair play and reasonable opportunity. In Surath Chandra’s case supra the facts were stated by the Supreme Court as follows:.

APTRANSCO Service Regulations, Leave Regulations

On your representation dated December 27, requesting for change in the place of posting you were given an opportunity by the Superintending Engineer twice to appear before him in person which you have failed to avail the opportunity on both the occasions. State of West Bengal I-LLJ that charges involving consequences of termination of service must be specific, though a departmental enquiry is not like a criminal trial as was noted by this Court in the case of State of Andhra Pradesh v.


Section Licencing of Contractors No contractor shall undertake any work. The leave application dated October 31, and the medical certificate dated February 10, of Karampudi is a clear indication that the accused had abstained from duty on his down, with effect from October 11, Audit and Performance Committee Report Date: Relationship between highest More information.


Get 1 point on providing a valid sentiment to this Citation. The 1st respondent considered the various aspects rregulations detail and held that no grounds were made out for interfering with the order passed by the 2nd respondent.

Pay Policy Statement 1 st February In the regulatjons case the principles of natural justice and fair play are not in any way violated as already observed by us earlier. It is also stated that as the enquiry was regulatiobs by the disciplinary authority himself, there was no separate report of the enquiry officer and that Memo dated October 27, given by the 2nd respondent to the petitioner contained all the reasons for arriving at the provisional conclusions of the 2nd respondent mentioned therein.

He had resorted to file an application seeking for leave on and off whenever it suits his convenience, with bad intentions only but not to join duty. No Delegation of powers.